netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem

To: "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@" <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem
From: Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 09:46:05 +0200
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040919.111141.42341294.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040918.084304.75142669.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040918220211.GI6005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040918180647.6be57884.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040919.111141.42341294.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 11:11:41AM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote:
 
> > On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 00:02:11 +0200
> > Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > Now I'm stuck with another issue:  The interfaces suddenly no logner
> > > get any link-local addresses:

> I've run TAHI test on post-rc2 kernel, 
> and the result is as I expected.
> I haven't met such issues...  hmm...

Apparently this happens when you 

1) insmod ipv6
2) ifconfig your interfaces up
3) only now ifconfig 'lo' up.

This happened due to a typo in my script :(  If 'lo' exists prior to the
other interfaces, everything seems to work as usual.

Is this desired or accidential and/or documented behaviour?

> --yoshfuji

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>               http://www.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
Programming is like sex: One mistake and you have to support it your lifetime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>