netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [XFRM] Make XFRM core subsystem af-independent

To: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [XFRM] Make XFRM core subsystem af-independent
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 09:16:11 +0900 (JST)
Cc: herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040917170607.2e96b58a.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <20040917153536.6acec52e.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040918.085003.77842779.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040917170607.2e96b58a.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
In article <20040917170607.2e96b58a.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Fri, 17 Sep 2004 
17:06:07 -0700), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:

> >  2. David's one
> >     - maintenancability will be improved
> >     - maintains exported symbols for binary-only modules.
> >     - more function call and more stack usage.
> 
> Compiler is smarter than you think :-)
> 
> The whole stack frame is eliminated, because gcc
> optimizes it away using tail-call optimizations.

Okay, thank you for explanation.
I'm not sure (and have some doubt) on i386,
but I am now smarter than before. :-)

--yoshfuji

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>