netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Crypto tests via tcrypt.o modules failes

To: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Crypto tests via tcrypt.o modules failes
From: Zilvinas Valinskas <zilvinas@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:21:26 +0300
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Xine.LNX.4.44.0409171056470.7996-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Gemtek Baltic
References: <Xine.LNX.4.44.0409171056470.7996-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: zilvinas@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 17:58, James Morris wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Zilvinas Valinskas wrote:
> 
> > I would say Xscale IXP425 has a rather interesting 32, 16 bits
> > read/write results if address is not aligned properly. In the same
> > directory - http://www.gemtek.lt/~zilvinas/crypto/ i've put *.pdf
> > describing what exactly is happening. 
> 
> I've had a report that all is well on an Xscale PXA (SoC) system, with a 
> 2.6.7-rc2 kernel.  Are there any significant differences between that and 
> what you have?
2.4.27 and 2.6.7-rc2 I think quite different - can you tell me which
parts to check for differencies ?

Here I use 2.4.27 + IPsec patch (from Herbert Xu) + Xscale bits
(arch/arm - directory is only patched). I can do a full diff between 
vanilla 2.4.27 and what I've got if you like and put on web.

> 
> - James


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>