| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TX performance of Intel 82546 |
| From: | Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:02:22 +0200 |
| Cc: | P@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux NICS <linux.nics@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1095250706.1057.214.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040915081439.GA27038@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <414808F3.70104@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095250706.1057.214.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i |
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 08:18:27AM -0400, jamal wrote: > Our friends in FreeBSD claim they can do 1Mpps _forwarding_ with > e1000 - forget about transmit only ;-> IMHO that was a 82547, attached to CSA and not PCI-X... -- - Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.netfilter.org/ ============================================================================ "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TX performance of Intel 82546, P |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TCP's reaction to soft errors, Fernando Gont |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TX performance of Intel 82546, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TX performance of Intel 82546, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |