netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TX performance of Intel 82546

To: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TX performance of Intel 82546
From: Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:02:22 +0200
Cc: P@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux NICS <linux.nics@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1095250706.1057.214.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040915081439.GA27038@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <414808F3.70104@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095250706.1057.214.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 08:18:27AM -0400, jamal wrote:

> Our friends in FreeBSD claim they can do 1Mpps _forwarding_ with 
> e1000 - forget about transmit only ;->

IMHO that was a 82547, attached to CSA and not PCI-X... 

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>             http://www.netfilter.org/
============================================================================
  "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
   architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
   on while IP was being designed."                    -- Paul Vixie

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>