| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Extend netlink error codes |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:33:08 -0700 |
| Cc: | tgraf@xxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040913062613.GA12185@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040910225158.GO20088@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040911155839.GN4431@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040911162433.GC21181@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040912163744.52f95367.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040913062613.GA12185@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 08:26:13 +0200 Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote: > I actually don't think it will be a big issue for them. > They already translate messages by mapping text to other > text. The same thing could be done for kernel messages, > by just marking them in the kernel somehow that they > can be automatically extracted from the source and then > later mapping them to the translations in user space. I understand, but I'm specifically talking about this "synchronization" issue. Anyways, I think strings are fine. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Fix locking bug in lltx path, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Fix locking bug in lltx path, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] Extend netlink error codes, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | [Routing] Performance Comparison between 2.6 and 2.4 kernel, Song Wang |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |