netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] NETIF_F_LLTX for devices 2

To: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NETIF_F_LLTX for devices 2
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 17:10:45 -0700
Cc: jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1095010469.2344.215.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <E1C4wYe-0005qT-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040908072408.GI27886@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1094629677.1089.155.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040908134713.1bcd46d3.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1094823215.1121.129.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040911142116.GL4431@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1094933731.2343.109.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040911174535.2acbb957.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040912100114.GB11484@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040912102529.GA27096@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040912161604.GA23366@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095010469.2344.215.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 12 Sep 2004 13:34:30 -0400
jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sun, 2004-09-12 at 12:16, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Thanks, but still need a patch for return value constants, otherwise you
> > are compounding rather than addressing a current problem.
> 
> Something along the lines of attached patch?
> Francois needs to update the doc and you need someone to get the
> janitors enthusiastic (i just updated e1000)

Looks beautiful.  I added this patch and did the tg3 bits
in my local tree as well.

Thanks Jamal.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>