| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [IP6IP6] Handle ECN correctly |
| From: | Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 9 Sep 2004 10:04:33 +0300 (EEST) |
| Cc: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20040908214926.51b56a66.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, David S. Miller wrote: > We were going to make all the ipv4 tunnels offer encapsulation > behavior for these fields that matched the two major models > of behavior described in the IP tunneling RFCs. > > Specifically I'm talking about the Uniform and the Pipe model > described in RFC-2983. Now that we're talking about RFCs and tunnels, I'd like to point out draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-06.txt which replaces the old v6-in-v4 tunneling RFC, and is at the point of approval as RFC. Sorry for hijacking the thread :) -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] acx100 inclusion in mainline; generic 802.11 stack, Vladimir Kondratiev |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Fwd: Re: question: linux TCP/IP stack implementation], Hanno |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [IP6IP6] Handle ECN correctly, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | [Fwd: Re: question: linux TCP/IP stack implementation], Hanno |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |