| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [IP6IP6] Handle ECN correctly |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 9 Sep 2004 14:54:15 +1000 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040908214926.51b56a66.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040909034508.GA19547@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040908214023.08dec350.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040909044336.GA19999@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040908214926.51b56a66.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i |
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 09:49:26PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > > We were going to make all the ipv4 tunnels offer encapsulation > behavior for these fields that matched the two major models > of behavior described in the IP tunneling RFCs. > > Specifically I'm talking about the Uniform and the Pipe model > described in RFC-2983. You mean the TOS field? > I would expect a change for that to occur in net/ipv4/ipip.c > or similar. :) OK, I'll take a look at this. I presume that the TOS options in ip6tunnel.c is to your liking? Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [IP6IP6] Handle ECN correctly, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [IP6IP6] Handle ECN correctly, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [IP6IP6] Handle ECN correctly, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [IP6IP6] Handle ECN correctly, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |