| To: | Peter Buckingham <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] ipconfig accepts any DHCPACK |
| From: | Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 07 Sep 2004 17:12:11 -0700 |
| Cc: | David S Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <413E39F2.4070708@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <413E2C26.5040108@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040907150204.119ba849.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <413E39F2.4070708@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 15:45, Peter Buckingham wrote:
> is this okay?
> + for (i = 0; (dev->dev_addr[i] == b->hw_addr[i])
> + && (i < dev->addr_len); i++);
> + if (i < dev->addr_len)
> + goto drop_unlock;
> +
I had to read that twice.
How about something like:
for (i=0;i<dev->addr_len;i++)
if (dev->dev_addr[i] != b->hw_addr[i])
goto drop_unlock;
or
if (memcmp(dev->dev_addr, b->hw_addr, dev->addr_len)!=0)
goto drop_unlock;
instead?
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.6]: Fix suboptimal fragment sizing for last fragment, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] ipconfig accepts any DHCPACK, Peter Buckingham |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] ipconfig accepts any DHCPACK, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] ipconfig accepts any DHCPACK, Peter Buckingham |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |