netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2.6] watch64: generic variable monitoring system

To: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jeffpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6] watch64: generic variable monitoring system
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 04 Sep 2004 09:19:59 -0400
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200409031744.32970.jeffpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: jamalopolis
References: <200409031307.01240.jeffpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200409031319.24863.jeffpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040903121657.355a6a8b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200409031744.32970.jeffpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
I have a feeling this was discussed somewhere(other than netdev) and i
missed it. Why isnt this watch64 being done in user space?

cheers,
jamal

On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 17:44, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Friday 03 September 2004 15:16, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > - Code doesn't match the kernel style (read Documentation/CodingStyle)
> 
> Sorry about the white space, KMail apparently likes to butcher the text. 
> These 
> are the same patches with the little cleanup update.
> 
> Jeff.
> 
> - -- 
> Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.
>   - Albert Einstein
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD4DBQFBOOW+wFP0+seVj/4RAgSiAJj54qcqdEx66lbMW9ik0XviupTNAKC82an1
> R0pGX0pTBZ78NWrZpxJm+w==
> =EesC
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>