netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: neigh_create/inetdev_destroy race?

To: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: neigh_create/inetdev_destroy race?
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 22:21:18 -0700
Cc: shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040831104139.GA2124@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040814005411.GA18350@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040814012513.GA721@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040814013030.GA2042@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040814050848.GA11874@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040814062703.GA4806@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040815191450.77532d5d.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040816105131.GA11299@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040828234201.79556f6e.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040829065031.GA786@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040830230820.7514985d.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040831104139.GA2124@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:41:39 +1000
Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > I think we can clear this by putting neigh_parms_release() into an
> > RCU handler.  It can't be in in_dev_rcu_put.
> 
> Yes that should go a long way in resolving this problem.

So here's the first step.  No rcu_read_lock()'s are needed
since the tbl->lock needs to be held as a write when
traversing these things anyways for other reasons.

Can you work on the next bit you mentioned, making
sure the corresponding idev is still alive when we add
a neighbour with its neigh_parms to the hash table?

Thanks.

===== include/net/neighbour.h 1.8 vs edited =====
--- 1.8/include/net/neighbour.h 2004-08-16 14:10:51 -07:00
+++ edited/include/net/neighbour.h      2004-09-01 21:57:37 -07:00
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
 #include <asm/atomic.h>
 #include <linux/skbuff.h>
 #include <linux/netdevice.h>
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/sysctl.h>
@@ -65,6 +66,8 @@
        void    *priv;
 
        void    *sysctl_table;
+
+       struct rcu_head rcu_head;
 
        int     base_reachable_time;
        int     retrans_time;
===== net/core/neighbour.c 1.28 vs edited =====
--- 1.28/net/core/neighbour.c   2004-04-29 16:26:35 -07:00
+++ edited/net/core/neighbour.c 2004-09-01 22:00:59 -07:00
@@ -1120,6 +1120,7 @@
        if (p) {
                memcpy(p, &tbl->parms, sizeof(*p));
                p->tbl            = tbl;
+               INIT_RCU_HEAD(&p->rcu_head);
                p->reachable_time =
                                neigh_rand_reach_time(p->base_reachable_time);
                if (dev && dev->neigh_setup && dev->neigh_setup(dev, p)) {
@@ -1135,6 +1136,14 @@
        return p;
 }
 
+static void neigh_rcu_free_parms(struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+       struct neigh_parms *parms =
+               container_of(head, struct neigh_parms, rcu_head);
+
+       kfree(parms);
+}
+
 void neigh_parms_release(struct neigh_table *tbl, struct neigh_parms *parms)
 {
        struct neigh_parms **p;
@@ -1146,7 +1155,7 @@
                if (*p == parms) {
                        *p = parms->next;
                        write_unlock_bh(&tbl->lock);
-                       kfree(parms);
+                       call_rcu(&parms->rcu_head, neigh_rcu_free_parms);
                        return;
                }
        }
@@ -1159,6 +1168,7 @@
 {
        unsigned long now = jiffies;
 
+       INIT_RCU_HEAD(&tbl->parms.rcu_head);
        tbl->parms.reachable_time =
                          neigh_rand_reach_time(tbl->parms.base_reachable_time);
 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>