| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: HELP for dccp implementation. |
| From: | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 1 Sep 2004 23:48:05 -0300 |
| Cc: | Zhikui Chen <zhikui.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, dccp@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040901133709.3637d63d.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <412CC269.8080907@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1093454747.1034.85.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4135A32A.4030901@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040901133709.3637d63d.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.5.1i |
Em Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 01:37:09PM -0700, David S. Miller escreveu:
> On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 12:23:38 +0200
> Zhikui Chen <zhikui.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > If I assign a value such as 0x ee9fbc00 to sk in dccp_rcv (before lookup
> > calling), and comment lookkup calling, I get a error report from
> > bh_lock_sock(sk) calling inside dccp_rcv, which error report is
> > spin_is_locked on uninitialized spinlock ee9fbc00, and spin_lock
> > (<NULL>:ee9fbc00) already locked by <NULL>/73.
> >
> > Do you know its reason? Thanks,
>
> Zhikui, are you working together with Arnaldo using his
> code base, like we suggested to you? Or are you working
> still on your own code?
Dave, I've been quite busy lately with some other projects and haven't
been able to colaborate with Zhikui, I hope to change this situation
soon.
Regards,
- Arnaldo
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Kernel-janitors] Re: [patch 1/8] irda/act200l-sir: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep(), maximilian attems |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: neigh_create/inetdev_destroy race?, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: HELP for dccp implementation., David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] Use RCU for tcp_ehash lookup, Srivatsa Vaddagiri |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |