Re: [patch 1/8] irda/act200l-sir: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep()

[maximilian attems <janitor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 01 Sep 2004, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 11:05:23PM +0200, janitor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > I would appreciate any comments from the janitor@sternweltens list. 
uups mangled some text there sorry for this silly email.
> 
>       I already commented that I don't like the confusing msleep()
> API and I prefer the more explicit schedule_timeout().
>       But that's only me...
> 
>       Jean

hmm we have still archs were HZ < 100.
i find msleep use msecs units a lot more readable than
        schedule_timeout((HZ + 99) / 100);

the schedule_timeout(HZ/100) gets safely converted with msleep.

--
maks
kernel janitor          http://janitor.kernelnewbies.org/