[Top] [All Lists]

[patch 10/16] net/mac89x0: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep()

To: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [patch 10/16] net/mac89x0: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep()
From: janitor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 23:03:26 +0200
Cc: jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, janitor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

I would appreciate any comments from the janitor@sternweltens list. This is one 
many) cases where I made a decision about replacing




msleep() is not exactly the same as the previous code, but I only did
this replacement where I thought long delays were *desired*. If this is
not the case here, then just disregard this patch. 


Description: Replace schedule_timeout() with msleep() to guarantee the
task delays for the desired time.

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Attems <janitor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


 linux-2.6.9-rc1-bk7-max/drivers/net/mac89x0.c |    3 +--
 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN drivers/net/mac89x0.c~msleep-drivers_net_max89x0 drivers/net/mac89x0.c
--- linux-2.6.9-rc1-bk7/drivers/net/mac89x0.c~msleep-drivers_net_max89x0        
2004-09-01 19:35:34.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.9-rc1-bk7-max/drivers/net/mac89x0.c       2004-09-01 
19:35:34.000000000 +0200
@@ -308,8 +308,7 @@ void __init reset_chip(struct net_device
        writereg(dev, PP_SelfCTL, readreg(dev, PP_SelfCTL) | POWER_ON_RESET);
        /* wait 30 ms */
-       current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
-       schedule_timeout(30*HZ/1000);
+       msleep(30);
        /* Wait until the chip is reset */
        reset_start_time = jiffies;


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [patch 10/16] net/mac89x0: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep(), janitor <=