| To: | Zhikui Chen <zhikui.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: HELP for dccp implementation. |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 1 Sep 2004 13:37:09 -0700 |
| Cc: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, dccp@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4135A32A.4030901@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | DaveM Loft Enterprises |
| References: | <412CC269.8080907@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1093454747.1034.85.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4135A32A.4030901@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 12:23:38 +0200 Zhikui Chen <zhikui.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If I assign a value such as 0x ee9fbc00 to sk in dccp_rcv (before lookup > calling), and comment lookkup calling, I get a error report from > bh_lock_sock(sk) calling inside dccp_rcv, which error report is > spin_is_locked on uninitialized spinlock ee9fbc00, and spin_lock > (<NULL>:ee9fbc00) already locked by <NULL>/73. > > Do you know its reason? Thanks, Zhikui, are you working together with Arnaldo using his code base, like we suggested to you? Or are you working still on your own code? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Bridge] BCP status, Eble, Dan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [patch 1/1] remove old ifdefs dmascc, janitor |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: HELP for dccp implementation., Zhikui Chen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: HELP for dccp implementation., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |