| To: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] MASQUERADE / policy routing ("Route send us somewhere else") |
| From: | Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:16:58 +0200 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0408310908120.4024@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20040830191915.04d49268.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1C1yRs-00086x-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040830223920.1db0d5ae.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0408310908120.4024@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i |
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 09:48:07AM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote: > So, if the input route for all packets selects dev1 before > NAT but MASQUERADE selects different device (nexthop) bad things > happen. It costs routing cache entries to provide oif key but almost > in any case the right gateway is selected (except when two nexthops > use same device). I am willing to compromise at that cost. I cannot imagine a combination of dynamic IP with multiple nexthop on the same device. Getting those policy routing / DSL / dynip / MASQUERADE cases right is definitely more important. Any static IP case should be using SNAT, that's always been documented. > Regards -- - Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.netfilter.org/ ============================================================================ "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] MASQUERADE / policy routing ("Route send us somewhere else"), Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] MASQUERADE / policy routing ("Route send us somewhere else"), Harald Welte |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] MASQUERADE / policy routing ("Route send us somewhere else"), Julian Anastasov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] MASQUERADE / policy routing ("Route send us somewhere else"), Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |