netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC] MASQUERADE / policy routing ("Route send us somewhere else")

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC] MASQUERADE / policy routing ("Route send us somewhere else")
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:33:22 +1000
Cc: laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040830192458.1476df60.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040831013841.GA5824@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1C1yGT-000859-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040830192458.1476df60.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 07:24:58PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:20:53 +1000
> Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > So it would be good to know why the oif key is a bad idea.
> 
> I'm OK with removing the oif check, but I'm not OK with the
> idea of specifying a specific output interface in the
> route lookup flow key here.

Can you please give a reason for that?
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>