netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Pablo Neira <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:20:29 -0700
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <413276D9.9080303@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <412DF807.2040703@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20040826141407.38b56729.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <412EB40A.6010100@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20040826214710.5e322f1a.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <412F1269.8090303@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20040827172736.543dbd54.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <413276D9.9080303@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 02:37:45 +0200
Pablo Neira <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Attached the 2.4.x version. It just spawns one kernel thread called 
> netlink, is it ok?

It's fine, I'm going to make 2 minor fixes:

1) Mark netlink_thread() function static.
2) Name the thread "knetlinkd" to be consistent with
   other kernel thread names.

Thanks Pablo.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  ipmr_get_route(), David S. Miller
Next by Date:  Re: Updated WE-18 (WPA) proposal, Pedro Ramalhais
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets, Pablo Neira
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets, Pablo Neira
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]