| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC/PATCH capture qdisc requeue event in stats |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 30 Aug 2004 18:56:32 -0400 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20040830154430.769d1d59.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <1093799632.1073.410.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040830144033.2265a6e6.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <1093904088.1043.12.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040830154430.769d1d59.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 18:44, David S. Miller wrote:
> On 30 Aug 2004 18:14:48 -0400
> jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Check the size, if it matches the older tc_stats size sans
> requeue stat addition, then don't try to reference that struct member.
>
> if (RTA_PAYLOAD(tb[TCA_STATS]) == sizeof(struct tc_stats_old)) {
> /* report everything sans requeue */
> } else if (RTA_PAYLOAD(tb[TCA_STATS]) == sizeof(struct tc_stats)) {
> /* report all stats, including requeue */
> } else {
> /* report error, etc. */
> }
Sounds reasonable to me. Some of the BSDs do this to maintain old compat
- just means keeping old struct around. Steve, agreeable to you?
Change to both kernel and user space or just user space?
cheers,
jamal
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC/PATCH capture qdisc requeue event in stats, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC/PATCH capture qdisc requeue event in stats, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC/PATCH capture qdisc requeue event in stats, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC/PATCH capture qdisc requeue event in stats, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |