netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Updated WE-18 (WPA) proposal

To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Updated WE-18 (WPA) proposal
From: Jean Tourrilhes <jt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:42:15 -0700
Address: HP Labs, 1U-17, 1501 Page Mill road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Cc: Jouni Malinen <jkmaline@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, hostap@xxxxxxxxx, Pedro Ramalhais <ramalhais@xxxxxxxxxxx>
E-mail: jt@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <413363CB.7060807@xxxxxxxxx>
Organisation: HP Labs Palo Alto
References: <20040830045441.GA7415@xxxxxxxxx> <20040830165026.GD29492@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <413363CB.7060807@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: jt@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 01:28:43PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> >     Don't worry, I'll fix that. Anyway, WE-17 is pending in Jeff's
> >tree, and I don't think he will make major changes to it.
> 
> 
> hehe :)
> 
> Yep, it's merged in netdev-2.6 (and thus -mm as well), and queued for 
> upstream.

        Thanks ;-)

> FWIW any 'radical' wireless changes will go into wireless-2.6.  There is 
> still the stable upstream branch, to which WE patches can continue to be 
> applied...

        If you don't mind, I would like a bit more understanding about
how much is "radical" and how much is not. I would personally put that
around "breaking backward compatibility", but you may have other
ideas.
        Also, I'm not clear how the stuff in wireless-2.6 is supposed
to trickle into the other trees (netdev-2.6, -mm and Linus's), and how
to better link it with the CVS of the various drivers involved.

>       Jeff

        Have fun...

        Jean

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>