| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Prevent crash on ip_conntrack removal |
| From: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:06:36 +0200 |
| Cc: | dlstevens@xxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, okir@xxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040829125708.5aa70469.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <412A8FB5.4080700@xxxxxxxxx> <OFE08A3DF5.09BCA1C4-ON88256EFA.00806C05-88256EFA.0080E98F@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040828231529.051a73cc.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4132303C.2060807@xxxxxxxxx> <20040829125708.5aa70469.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040413 Debian/1.6-5 |
David S. Miller wrote: On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:36:28 +0200 Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Attached. The first patch still crashed, we need to prevent new fragments from getting queued after the queue is flushed until the hook in unregistered.While we're doing this, is your patch similar to one of the two original ones that Olaf Kirch posted? I want to give him proper attribution, in whatever form is reasonable, that's all. It is based on his second patch. He didn't sign off, otherwise I just would have kept his Signed-off-by: line. Regards Patrick |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Prevent crash on ip_conntrack removal, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH][0/4] b44: Cleanup and bcm47xx support, Florian Schirmer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Prevent crash on ip_conntrack removal, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Prevent crash on ip_conntrack removal, Patrick McHardy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |