netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Openswan Users] Invalid argument NULL

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Openswan Users] Invalid argument NULL
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:17:17 -0700
Cc: jiva@xxxxxxxxxxx, users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040817011717.GA18992@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <BD428BAA.4BBE%jiva@xxxxxxxxxxx> <E1BwINn-0000ZX-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040815112548.GA2864@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040815195313.31bacf13.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040817004141.GA18789@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040816180350.780e4912.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040817011717.GA18992@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:17:17 +1000
Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I mean that we should keep the numbers internally.  So xfrm_user.c
> will translate the names given by existing applications into numbers
> as the patch that you've just applied does.

Ok, that works.

> We can then create a new NETLINK payload type that uses numbers if
> we wish.

I think that will just be bloat.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [Openswan Users] Invalid argument NULL, Herbert Xu
Next by Date:  [XFRM] Kill unused flow_hash, Herbert Xu
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Openswan Users] Invalid argument NULL, Herbert Xu
Next by Thread:  Re: kernel-2.6.8.1 EIP is at velocity_netdev_event+0x16/0x50, George Georgalis
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]