| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Openswan Users] Invalid argument NULL |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:03:50 -0700 |
| Cc: | jiva@xxxxxxxxxxx, users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040817004141.GA18789@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <BD428BAA.4BBE%jiva@xxxxxxxxxxx> <E1BwINn-0000ZX-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040815112548.GA2864@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040815195313.31bacf13.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040817004141.GA18789@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 10:41:41 +1000 Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So maybe we should keep the numbers? If we take out the names, won't this break xfrm_user apps that currently can receive them? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Openswan Users] Invalid argument NULL, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Openswan Users] Invalid argument NULL, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Openswan Users] Invalid argument NULL, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Openswan Users] Invalid argument NULL, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |