Re: [PATCH/RFC] set_rates support for prism54

[margitsw@xxxxxxxxxxx (Margit Schubert-While)]

Denis scribeth:
> Ok. And then we will need to parse that data into format suitable for
> prism54 in prism54 driver, and into format suitable for acx100/acx111
> in acx100 driver, etc...

No, no. The format as it arrives at the driver should be fixed/defined.
Exactly as happens to private ioctls now.
Let's, for the sake of argument, say that we misuse the iw_freq structure.
(We can/should define a new structure)
iwpriv parses and sets up an iw_freq structure in the buffer that
it passes for -each- rate.
eg:
freq.i = rate
freq.m = modulation
freq.e = basic/extended

So, the driver gets a bunch of defined structures to act upon.

Margit