| To: | OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ksoftirqd uses 99% CPU triggered by network traffic (maybe RLT-8139 related) |
| From: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 5 Aug 2004 19:21:59 +0200 |
| Cc: | Hector Martin <hector@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pasi Sjoholm <ptsjohol@xxxxxxxxx>, Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, akpm@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, brad@xxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <871xiltxhz.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 12:28:40AM +0900 |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0408041915510.14609-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41120882.40302@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41121237.4050305@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040805132233.A7430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <871xiltxhz.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] > On the final analysis, what was the cause of this problem? See answer 42 > I found the following in progguide-8100(100).pdf. Does this help something? It makes sense. The previous code did not allow the ISR to be written under any circumstance. -- Ueimor |
| Previous by Date: | Re: SO_REUSEADDR behavior different from BSD, Michael T Kerrisk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: SO_REUSEADDR behavior different from BSD, David Stevens |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ksoftirqd uses 99% CPU triggered by network traffic (maybe RLT-8139 related), OGAWA Hirofumi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC,PATCH] fastroute dead code..., Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |