| To: | Pekka Pietikainen <pp@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] b44 1GB DMA workaround (was: b44: add 47xx support) |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:39:19 -0700 |
| Cc: | jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, jolt@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040804003108.GA10445@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200407232335.37809.jolt@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040726141128.GA5435@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040804003108.GA10445@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 03:31:08 +0300
Pekka Pietikainen <pp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> + if(mapping+len > B44_DMA_MASK) {
> + /* Chip can't handle DMA to/from >1GB, use bounce buffer */
> + pci_unmap_single(bp->pdev, mapping, len,PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
> + memcpy(bp->tx_bufs+entry*TX_PKT_BUF_SZ,skb->data,skb->len);
> + skb->data=bp->tx_bufs+entry*TX_PKT_BUF_SZ;
> + mapping = pci_map_single(bp->pdev, skb->data, len,
> PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
> + }
Changing skb->data is not legal. Please implement this in
such a way that skb->data does not get modified. By modifying
skb->data you will break things such as packet sniffers and
netfilter, and that's just the tip of the iceberg. :-)
I would suggest merely freeing up this TX skb, and marking the
entry in the b44 software state with some dummy skb pointer
such as (void *) 0x1UL or something like that to indicate
this case.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH 2.6] Wireless Extension v17 for Linus, Jean Tourrilhes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Transparent Proxying, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] b44 1GB DMA workaround (was: b44: add 47xx support), Pekka Pietikainen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] b44 1GB DMA workaround (was: b44: add 47xx support), Pekka Pietikainen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |