| To: | Pasi Sjoholm <ptsjohol@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ksoftirqd uses 99% CPU triggered by network traffic (maybe RLT-8139 related) |
| From: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:50:26 +0200 |
| Cc: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, H?ctor Mart?n <hector@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, akpm@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, brad@xxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0408031523220.32102-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from ptsjohol@xxxxxxxxx on Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 03:32:15PM +0300 |
| References: | <20040803003515.A29885@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0408031523220.32102-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
Pasi Sjoholm <ptsjohol@xxxxxxxxx> :
[...]
> The first log file is with both patchs applied and the second one with one
> little change to rx8139_rx() to show if it even goes to through
>
> " while (netif_running(dev) && received < budget
> && (RTL_R8 (ChipCmd) & RxBufEmpty) == 0) {"-section.
>
> This was the change which I made.. so you can see in the second log file
> that there won't be any of these messages after the driver has crashed.
If you remove the "if (received > 0) {" test in r8139-10.patch and keep
both patches applied, I assume you are back to a crash within 15min (instead
of within 2min as suggested by the log), right ?
--
Ueimor
|
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH 2.6 1/5]: Fix locking in __qdisc_destroy rcu-callback, Patrick McHardy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: iproute2 and kernel headers, Mariusz Mazur |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ksoftirqd uses 99% CPU triggered by network traffic (maybe RLT-8139 related), Pasi Sjoholm |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ksoftirqd uses 99% CPU triggered by network traffic (maybe RLT-8139 related), Pasi Sjoholm |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |