| To: | Tomasz Torcz <zdzichu@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: iproute2 and kernel headers |
| From: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 3 Aug 2004 08:31:42 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040803001459.GA8637@xxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Open Source Development Lab |
| References: | <20040802153805.487f832f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040803001459.GA8637@xxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 02:14:59 +0200 Tomasz Torcz <zdzichu@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 03:38:05PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > I am willing to put some headers (not all) in with the user level > > code, provided they are copies since they I can easily update. I don't want > > to get into keeping an edited set of headers in sync. > > Aren't linux-libc-headers (*) sufficient? > > * - http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~mmazur/linux-libc-headers/ The theory of that is good, but in practice it would make the problem worse. What iproute2 wants is to have the same kernel data structures as the latest kernel. It is awkward enough making sure to get them from the correct kernel sources, but doing it from a different package would make updating and keeping everything current worse. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH 2.6 5/5]: remove noop_qdisc assignments in destroy functions, Patrick McHardy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.6 3/5]: Use double-linked list for dev->qdisc_list, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: iproute2 and kernel headers, Tomasz Torcz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: iproute2 and kernel headers, Mariusz Mazur |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |