[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup

To: davem@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 01:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kazunori@xxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040802190914.303ccfbe.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <20040730171205.114f22ba.kazunori@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040802074147.GA16381@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040802190914.303ccfbe.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
In article <20040802190914.303ccfbe.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Mon, 2 Aug 2004 
19:09:14 -0700), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> says:

> An intesting solution would be to use stacked destinations, which
> do no actual encapsulation (or perhaps do the routing header work)
> and merely represent the hop-by-hop path.  Then the PMTU propagation
> machinery can be used, and route lookups will go through a slower path
> to find these special stacked hop-by-hop routes.

Well, I think it would probably be another rt6_info{} member 
rt6i_srcrt (or something like that).


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>