[Top] [All Lists]

Re: patches

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: patches
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:22:52 +1000
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040729192046.0a3fb71d.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040729181948.5d36f47f.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040730012431.GA21253@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040729192046.0a3fb71d.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 07:20:46PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> Based upon reading of the rest of the thread about
> this patch I understand that:
> 1) Direction checking suggested by Yoshifuji is unecessary
>    because on input segments_left will be zero in the type 0
>    routing header.
> 2) Both ipv4 and ipv6 erroneously do the xfrm route lookup
>    using the first hop destination not the final destination.
>    And this needs to be fixed with a followon patch.
> Is this correct?


Visit Openswan at
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page:
PGP Key:

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>