[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] pkt_cls.h incompatiables

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pkt_cls.h incompatiables
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 29 Jul 2004 07:30:02 -0400
Cc: yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, arekm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1091100138.1044.549.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: jamalopolis
References: <20040722134522.4e7e0b07@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040722.200426.99255296.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1090593676.1128.25.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040723.110007.27520072.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1090612669.1218.47.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040723135945.7f50b02c.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <1090630154.1134.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1090675993.1161.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040724222853.752137d6.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <1091100138.1044.549.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Patch was against 2.6.8-rc2 not bk20.


On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 07:22, jamal wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-07-25 at 01:28, David S. Miller wrote:
> > Ok, I'll keep this in my inbox until you give the word.
> [Still trying to recover after all those conferences].
> Heres a patch that passes all my regression tests. I use a 
> __u64 instead of u64 for perf counters since user space understands it.
> cheers,
> jamal
> PS:- at some point we need to scrub the general backward compatibility
> issues going forward. 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>