| To: | Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: pcmcia ether drivers can't be unloaded] |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:54:19 -0700 |
| Cc: | jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, greg@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040728165024.A8475@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <41068BEF.7010200@xxxxxxxxx> <20040727233614.B30782@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040727171929.17858c7b.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040728165024.A8475@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:50:24 +0100 Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 05:19:29PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > > I totally disagree. This is a bogus argument for two reasons: > > You may disagree, that is your option. However, facts are facts - > this is how the PCMCIA layer currently works, and short of rewriting > the whole damned thing it isn't going to change. Sorry. Stephen offered a solution, moving this stray refcount into a toplevel pcmcia bus type object. We are not constrained by how the PCMCIA layer currently works, just as we were not constrained a year ago by how the generic network device handling worked when it was totally broken in this area. We just fixed it instead of whining. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: kernel bug at sched.c:564! + linux kernel 2.4.25, Niranjan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: kernel bug at sched.c:564! + linux kernel 2.4.25, James Morris |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Fwd: pcmcia ether drivers can't be unloaded], Russell King |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH][ATM]: [lec] remove unnecessary inlines (from Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>), chas williams (contractor) |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |