| To: | johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [1/2] CARP implementation. HA master's failover. |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 17 Jul 2004 16:32:17 -0400 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-failover@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040718000355.52e1ac02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolis |
| References: | <1089898303.6114.859.camel@uganda> <1089898595.6114.866.camel@uganda> <1089902654.1029.23.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1089905244.6114.887.camel@uganda> <1089907622.1027.48.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1089910760.6114.967.camel@uganda> <1089912285.1028.93.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040715235313.69897131@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1089983064.1060.1328.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1089990401.6114.2843.camel@uganda> <1090068454.1064.1258.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040717180019.7db1473f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1090081781.1063.1346.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040718000355.52e1ac02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 2004-07-17 at 16:03, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > Thank you for interesting discussion, I think we see each one's > position, we see it's advantages and disadvantages, but we have just a > bit different vews :) Indeed. I would say we have agreed to disagree ;-> [Maybe at some point when i get excited about CARP you will see alternative (user space based) code. I am hoping someone else (Like Alexander Cassen) would beat me to it.] cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [1/2] CARP implementation. HA master's failover., Evgeniy Polyakov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] Remove prototypes of nonexistent functions from net/sctp files, Carl Spalletta |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [1/2] CARP implementation. HA master's failover., Evgeniy Polyakov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [nf-failover] Re: [1/2] CARP implementation. HA master's failover., KOVACS Krisztian |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |