[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2.6] update to network emulation QOS scheduler

To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6] update to network emulation QOS scheduler
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 08 Jul 2004 09:36:14 -0400
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, Catalin BOIE <util@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040707142216.7c9763c3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: jamalopolis
References: <20040701113312.43cfe6c5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040702134437.5891e998@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1088824432.1043.271.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040707111055.32ebb25b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1089226667.1027.411.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040707135831.4c98dd51@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1089234699.1026.448.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040707142216.7c9763c3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
I have taken out lartc from the CC; it keeps bouncing emails back to me.

On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 17:22, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

> Actually, the problem only occurs if burst is set large (like 2mb).
> I think it gets stuck waiting for that much data.

Sounds like a bug. If you have the exact setup description i can chase
What about CBQ, HTB, H-FSC?
The other way to do it is actually put a router next to a localy
generated traffic. I have used this many times in the past
(a sample is at: section 4.1)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>