Re: [PATCH] deinline sock_i_uid,sock_i

netdev

Re: [PATCH] deinline sock_i_uid,sock_i_ino

To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] deinline sock_i_uid,sock_i_ino
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 7 Jul 2004 14:06:53 -0700
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20040707095443.7b54b63d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<20040707095443.7b54b63d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 09:54:43 -0700
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The sock_i_uid and sock_i_ino functions are only called by /proc type
> interfaces, so they don't need to be inlined. 
> 
> Also, the inline functions writeable, rcvtimeo, sndtimeo are test for
> value functions that don't change their argument.

Looks good, applied.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] deinline sock_i_uid,sock_i_ino, Stephen Hemminger Re: [PATCH] deinline sock_i_uid,sock_i_ino, David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH 2.6] update to network emulation QOS scheduler, Stephen Hemminger
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH 2.6] update to network emulation QOS scheduler, jamal
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH] deinline sock_i_uid,sock_i_ino, Stephen Hemminger
Next by Thread:	[PATCH] mark CSZ scheduler as broken, Stephen Hemminger
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]