Re: [RFC] TCP burst control

netdev

Re: [RFC] TCP burst control

To:	"Injong Rhee" <rhee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [RFC] TCP burst control
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 6 Jul 2004 17:29:13 -0700
Cc:	shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, rhee@xxxxxxxx, lxu2@xxxxxxxx, mathis@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<200407070009.i6709wiA026673@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<20040706160447.3c2efffa.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <200407070009.i6709wiA026673@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 20:09:41 -0400
"Injong Rhee" <rhee@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Currently with rate having, current Linux tcp stack is full of hacks that in
> fact, hurt the performance of linux tcp (sorry to say this).

If rate-halving is broken, have you taken this up with it's creator,
Mr. Mathis?  What was his response?

I've added him to the CC: list so this can be properly discussed.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[RFC] TCP burst control, Stephen Hemminger Re: [RFC] TCP burst control, David S. Miller RE: [RFC] TCP burst control, Injong Rhee Re: [RFC] TCP burst control, David S. Miller <= RE: [RFC] TCP burst control, Injong Rhee RE: [RFC] TCP burst control, Injong Rhee RE: [RFC] TCP burst control, Matt Mathis RE: [RFC] TCP burst control, Injong Rhee RE: [RFC] TCP burst control, Weiguang Shi Re: [RFC] TCP burst control, Nivedita Singhvi Re: [RFC] TCP burst control, Xiaoliang (David) Wei Re: [RFC] TCP burst control, Lisong Xu

Previous by Date:	RE: [RFC] TCP burst control, Injong Rhee
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] fix tcp_default_win_scale., John Heffner
Previous by Thread:	RE: [RFC] TCP burst control, Injong Rhee
Next by Thread:	RE: [RFC] TCP burst control, Injong Rhee
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]