netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] fix tcp_default_win_scale.

To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix tcp_default_win_scale.
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 13:35:59 -0700
Cc: jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040706133641.4a58af30@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <32886.63.170.215.71.1088564087.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040629222751.392f0a82.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040630152750.2d01ca51@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040630153049.3ca25b76.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040701133738.301b9e46@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040701140406.62dfbc2a.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040702013225.GA24707@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040706093503.GA8147@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040706114741.1bf98bbe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040706194034.GA11021@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040706130549.31daa8e0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040706132822.70c8174a.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040706133641.4a58af30@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 13:36:41 -0700
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Ok, this is a possibility.  And why it breaks is that if the ACK
> > for the SYN+ACK comes back, the SYN+ACK sender can only assume
> > that the window scale was accepted.
> > 
> > Stephen, do you have a trace showing exactly this?
> 
> No, I don't have a br0ken firewall here.  I can get out fine.
> When I setup with same kernel as packages.gentoo.org, it works fine as well.

Therefore we do not know which of the following two it really is:

1) window scale option being stripped from SYN+ACK

2) non-zero window option being patched into a zero window
   scale option

The trace Bert Hubert will get with Alessandro will give us the
information we need.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>