| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Openswan dev] IPComp |
| From: | James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 6 Jul 2004 12:43:10 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Xine.LNX.4.44.0407061031090.22633-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, James Morris wrote: > We should not perform this allocation for each packet. Well, actually, IPComp is so slow that it may not do much more damage to performance. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: multicast testing, Manfred Spraul |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: bk16 changes to cbq, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Openswan dev] IPComp, James Morris |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Openswan dev] IPComp, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |