| To: | "Angelo Dell'Aera" <buffer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TCP congestion control article |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:11:58 -0700 |
| Cc: | linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040625123953.1d42b556.buffer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040625123953.1d42b556.buffer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:39:53 +0200 "Angelo Dell'Aera" <buffer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I just want to point out to you a really interesting article published > by two members of my research group. The paper is entitled > "Performance Evaluation and Comparison of Westwood+, New Reno and > Vegas TCP Congestion Control" and it aims at evaluating these three > algorithms in really different scenarios. Would be interesting to compare with BITCP which we have enabled by default now in current 2.6.x kernels. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TCP receiver's window calculation problem, John Heffner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [NAT-T] NON-IKE encapsulation, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | TCP congestion control article, Angelo Dell'Aera |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TCP congestion control article, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |