| To: | Cheng Jin <chengjin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TCP receiver's window calculation problem |
| From: | John Heffner <jheffner@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:43:32 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "fast-support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <fast-support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0406241331590.1272-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Cheng Jin wrote: > The receiver is set to use a 9000 MTU, but the sender uses a 1500-byte > MTU, which is not really a pathological case. It would have made more > sense for the receiver to allocate skbs of the right size as incoming > packets are received. Some drivers are apparently optimized for this case. I have not confirmed this. > Is it due to effciency reasons that the skbs are just fixed in size > according to the set MTU on the interface card? I suppose that the > receiver has no real way of knowing the right MTU size at the sender. I haven't looked too hard in to this. Any device driver people want to chime in? -John |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [IPSEC] Check encap_type at config time, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: TCP congestion control article, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TCP receiver's window calculation problem, Cheng Jin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 jumbo problems, P |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |