| To: | David Stevens <dlstevens@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: About MLDv2 specification |
| From: | Takashi Hibi <hibi665@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:38:17 +0900 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | (Your message of "Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:06:00 -0700") <OFE94A3A87.01006C67-ON88256EBA.0072B763-88256EBA.0073CEA1@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <OFE94A3A87.01006C67-ON88256EBA.0072B763-88256EBA.0073CEA1@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
David Stevens <dlstevens@xxxxxxxxxx> : > Takashi, > I believe your patch will work in suppressing empty > MODE_IS_INCLUDE, but in the event the report for an empty > MODE_IS_INCLUDE is the only record, it'll still go through the > timer for all the retransmits. I want to see how hard it'd be not > to start the report timer at all for this case, and also make sure > any other changes are taken care of. The patch looks ok to me > for the interim, though. > > +-DLS > mld_send_cr() is called for retransmission of the report, but MODE_IS_INCLUDE is never used in this function. MODE_IS_INCLUDE is only used in mld_send_report(), and it is called for the response to MLDv2 query. Therefore no side effects occur, I think. Regards, Takashi Hibi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH 2.4.26] prism54: add prism54 1.2, mcgrof |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Prism54 1.2 is out, Luis R. Rodriguez |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: About MLDv2 specification, David Stevens |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [NET]: Lockless loopback patch (version 2)., Andrew Morton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |