Re: [LARTC] [ANNOUNCE] sch_ooo - Out-of-order packet queue discipline

netdev

To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [LARTC] [ANNOUNCE] sch_ooo - Out-of-order packet queue discipline
From:	Catalin BOIE <util@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:52:01 +0300 (EEST)
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20040622084607.4996569f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0404021023140.18886@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040622084607.4996569f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

Maybe the delay and ooo scheduler should be merged, the both do sort of
the same thing.


Yes, it's true.
I can work on a patch if you want.

---
Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE
catab at deuroconsult.ro
http://kernel.umbrella.ro/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ANNOUNCE] sch_ooo - Out-of-order packet queue discipline, Catalin BOIE Re: [LARTC] [ANNOUNCE] sch_ooo - Out-of-order packet queue discipline, Stephen Hemminger Re: [LARTC] [ANNOUNCE] sch_ooo - Out-of-order packet queue discipline, Catalin BOIE <= Re: [LARTC] [ANNOUNCE] sch_ooo - Out-of-order packet queue discipline, David S. Miller

Previous by Date:	[PATCH] skfddi - cleanup local and dead functions, Stephen Hemminger
Next by Date:	[PATCH] skfddi - fix warning, Stephen Hemminger
Previous by Thread:	Re: [LARTC] [ANNOUNCE] sch_ooo - Out-of-order packet queue discipline, Stephen Hemminger
Next by Thread:	Re: [LARTC] [ANNOUNCE] sch_ooo - Out-of-order packet queue discipline, David S. Miller
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]