netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC] Wireless extensions rethink

To: jt@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [RFC] Wireless extensions rethink
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:11:54 -0400
Cc: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@xxxxxxx>, sfeldma@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, jkmaline@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <40D1EC54.8000904@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <C6F5CF431189FA4CBAEC9E7DD5441E0103AF626C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40CF263E.70009@xxxxxxx> <1087377197.25912.54.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40D08769.3070106@xxxxxxx> <20040616204248.GA23617@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40D0BD5B.201@xxxxxxxxx> <20040616223316.GA29618@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40D0D265.3070804@xxxxxxxxx> <20040617174717.GA30460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40D1E185.2010201@xxxxxxxxx> <20040617185605.GA32216@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40D1EC54.8000904@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040510
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Yes, but...  that's the way the Linux kernel works.

Er, I meant to say, that's NOT the way the kernel works.

Talk about a Freudian slip :)

        Jeff



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>