netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC] Wireless extensions rethink

To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Wireless extensions rethink
From: Jean Tourrilhes <jt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:58:15 -0700
Address: HP Labs, 1U-17, 1501 Page Mill road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@xxxxxxx>, sfeldma@xxxxxxxxx, jkmaline@xxxxxxxxx
E-mail: jt@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <40D1E24C.8090802@xxxxxxxxx>
Organisation: HP Labs Palo Alto
References: <40CF263E.70009@xxxxxxx> <1087377197.25912.54.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40D08769.3070106@xxxxxxx> <20040616204248.GA23617@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40D0BD5B.201@xxxxxxxxx> <20040616223316.GA29618@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40D0D265.3070804@xxxxxxxxx> <20040617174717.GA30460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40D1E185.2010201@xxxxxxxxx> <40D1E24C.8090802@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: jt@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 02:26:20PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
> Note that the above is only a first step.  Through the standard Linux 
> development process -- evolution -- each hook can be pared down to 
> precisely what each call needs.  The above allows for a quick transition 
> of drivers, while keeping them working.
> 
>       Jeff

        Have you looked at the patch I sent you ? In which way does it
fails to meet your need ?

        Jean

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>