| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Vladimir Kondratiev <vkondra@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: in-driver QoS |
| From: | Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Jun 2004 11:45:37 +0900 |
| In-reply-to: | <200406092127.28477.vkondra@xxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Vladimir Kondratiev <vkondra@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040608184831.GA18462@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200406090851.40691.vkondra@xxxxxxx> <1086780010.1051.106.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200406092127.28477.vkondra@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i |
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 09:27:28PM +0300, Vladimir Kondratiev wrote: > > > > Indeed. > > Looking at the transmit path code it seems doable. > > for each dev->id you also maintain a dev->id_state. > > We either use skb->fwmark or skb->priority to map to the different > BTW, what is fwmark? in 2.6.6 it is not present. The name in the kernel was changed to nfmark a while ago. Though is seems to be still referenced as fwmark quite a lot in documentation. I believe its primary use is for the mark target and match in netfilter/iptables. -- Horms |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Help with some code, Joubert Berger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [0/3] mc_filter on big-endian arch, Roger Luethi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: in-driver QoS, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: in-driver QoS, Vladimir Kondratiev |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |