| To: | Roger Luethi <rl@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] ethtool semantics |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 9 Jun 2004 15:12:46 -0700 |
| Cc: | davidsen@xxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040609213850.GA17243@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040607212804.GA17012@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040607145723.41da5783.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040608210809.GA10542@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40C77C70.5070409@xxxxxxx> <20040609213850.GA17243@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 23:38:50 +0200 Roger Luethi <rl@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > <sigh> I just killed the module parameters in my via-rhine development > tree. That is absolutely the correct thing to do, module parameters for link settings are %100 deprecated, people need to use ethtool for everything. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] e1000 - get rid of tx_lock, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.6.7-rc3: waiting for eth0 to become free, Christian Kujau |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] ethtool semantics, Roger Luethi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] ethtool semantics, Marc Herbert |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |