netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Dealing with buggy hardware (was: b44 and 4g4g)

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Dealing with buggy hardware (was: b44 and 4g4g)
From: Pekka Pietikainen <pp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 15:29:05 +0300
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040605131923.232f8950.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040531202104.GA8301@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040605200643.GA2210@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040605131923.232f8950.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2i
On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 01:19:23PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jun 2004 23:06:44 +0300
> Pekka Pietikainen <pp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > +   if(virt_to_bus(skb->data) + skb->len > B44_PCI_DMA_MAX) {
> 
> You can't use this non-portable interface, you have to:
> 
> 1) pci_map the data
> 2) test the dma_addr_t returned
Ok, fixed. Certainly not ideal, but should fix things for those with
problems (ie. running the 4G4G patch) and work as before for everyone else.

--- linux-2.6.6-1.422/drivers/net/b44.h.4g4g    2004-06-09 15:19:21.315565880 
+0300
+++ linux-2.6.6-1.422/drivers/net/b44.h 2004-06-09 15:19:29.787277984 +0300
@@ -503,6 +503,7 @@
 
        struct ring_info        *rx_buffers;
        struct ring_info        *tx_buffers;
+       unsigned char           *tx_bufs; 
 
        u32                     dma_offset;
        u32                     flags;
@@ -534,7 +535,7 @@
        struct pci_dev          *pdev;
        struct net_device       *dev;
 
-       dma_addr_t              rx_ring_dma, tx_ring_dma;
+       dma_addr_t              rx_ring_dma, tx_ring_dma,tx_bufs_dma;
 
        u32                     rx_pending;
        u32                     tx_pending;
--- linux-2.6.6-1.422/drivers/net/b44.c.4g4g    2004-06-09 15:19:16.334323144 
+0300
+++ linux-2.6.6-1.422/drivers/net/b44.c 2004-06-09 15:22:48.754030440 +0300
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@
 #define NEXT_TX(N)             (((N) + 1) & (B44_TX_RING_SIZE - 1))
 
 #define RX_PKT_BUF_SZ          (1536 + bp->rx_offset + 64)
+#define TX_PKT_BUF_SZ          (B44_MAX_MTU + ETH_HLEN + 8)
 
 /* minimum number of free TX descriptors required to wake up TX process */
 #define B44_TX_WAKEUP_THRESH           (B44_TX_RING_SIZE / 4)
@@ -82,6 +83,12 @@
 
 static int b44_debug = -1;     /* -1 == use B44_DEF_MSG_ENABLE as value */
 
+/* Hardware bug work-around, the chip seems to be unable to do PCI DMA
+   to anything above 1GB :-( */
+
+#define B44_DMA_MASK 0x3fffffff
+static int b44_use_bounce_buffers = 0;
+
 static struct pci_device_id b44_pci_tbl[] = {
        { PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_BCM4401,
          PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0UL },
@@ -634,7 +641,13 @@
                src_map = &bp->rx_buffers[src_idx];
        dest_idx = dest_idx_unmasked & (B44_RX_RING_SIZE - 1);
        map = &bp->rx_buffers[dest_idx];
-       skb = dev_alloc_skb(RX_PKT_BUF_SZ);
+
+       if(!b44_use_bounce_buffers) {
+               skb = dev_alloc_skb(RX_PKT_BUF_SZ);
+       } else {
+               /* Sigh... */
+               skb = __dev_alloc_skb(RX_PKT_BUF_SZ,GFP_DMA);
+       }
        if (skb == NULL)
                return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -919,7 +932,12 @@
 
        entry = bp->tx_prod;
        mapping = pci_map_single(bp->pdev, skb->data, len, PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
-
+       if(b44_use_bounce_buffers && mapping+len > B44_DMA_MASK) {
+               pci_unmap_single(bp->pdev, mapping, len,PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
+               memcpy(bp->tx_bufs+entry*TX_PKT_BUF_SZ,skb->data,skb->len);
+               skb->data=bp->tx_bufs+entry*TX_PKT_BUF_SZ;
+               mapping = pci_map_single(bp->pdev, skb->data, len, 
PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
+       }
        bp->tx_buffers[entry].skb = skb;
        pci_unmap_addr_set(&bp->tx_buffers[entry], mapping, mapping);
 
@@ -1066,6 +1084,11 @@
                                    bp->tx_ring, bp->tx_ring_dma);
                bp->tx_ring = NULL;
        }
+       if (bp->tx_bufs) {
+               pci_free_consistent(bp->pdev, B44_TX_RING_SIZE * TX_PKT_BUF_SZ,
+                                   bp->tx_bufs, bp->tx_bufs_dma);
+               bp->tx_bufs = NULL;
+       }
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1088,6 +1111,13 @@
                goto out_err;
        memset(bp->tx_buffers, 0, size);
 
+       if(b44_use_bounce_buffers) {
+               size = B44_TX_RING_SIZE * TX_PKT_BUF_SZ;
+               bp->tx_bufs = pci_alloc_consistent(bp->pdev, size, 
&bp->tx_bufs_dma);
+               if (!bp->tx_bufs)
+                       goto out_err;
+               memset(bp->tx_bufs, 0, size);
+       }
        size = DMA_TABLE_BYTES;
        bp->rx_ring = pci_alloc_consistent(bp->pdev, size, &bp->rx_ring_dma);
        if (!bp->rx_ring)
@@ -1727,12 +1757,26 @@
 
        pci_set_master(pdev);
 
-       err = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, (u64) 0xffffffff);
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_4G
+       /* XXX Only needs to be set if > 1GB of physical memory, so
+           this check could be smarted */
+       b44_use_bounce_buffers=1;
+#endif
+       err = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, (u64) B44_DMA_MASK);
        if (err) {
                printk(KERN_ERR PFX "No usable DMA configuration, "
                       "aborting.\n");
                goto err_out_free_res;
        }
+       
+       if(b44_use_bounce_buffers) {
+               err = pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(pdev, (u64) B44_DMA_MASK);
+               if (err) {
+                       printk(KERN_ERR PFX "No usable DMA configuration, "
+                              "aborting.\n");
+                       goto err_out_free_res;
+               }
+       }
 
        b44reg_base = pci_resource_start(pdev, 0);
        b44reg_len = pci_resource_len(pdev, 0);

-- 
Pekka Pietikainen

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>