| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [RFC] ethtool semantics |
| From: | Roger Luethi <rl@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 7 Jun 2004 23:28:04 +0200 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Mail-followup-to: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6i |
What is the correct response if a user passes ethtool speed or duplex arguments while autoneg is on? Some possible answers are: a) Yell at the user for doing something stupid. b) Fail silently (i.e. ignore command). c) Change advertised value accordingly and initiate new negotiation. d) Consider "autoneg off" implied, force media accordingly. The ethtool(8) man page I'm looking at doesn't address that question. The actual behavior I've seen is b) which is by far my least preferred solution. Roger |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | how to interpret C statement?, linux lover |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: Linux wireless extensions and WPA support, Jean Tourrilhes |
| Previous by Thread: | how to interpret C statement?, linux lover |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] ethtool semantics, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |