| To: | Jouni Malinen <jkmaline@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Prism54 WPA Support - wpa_supplicant - Linux general wpa support |
| From: | Bradley Chapman <kakadu_croc@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Jun 2004 04:05:06 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | Netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Jean Tourrilhes <jt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, hostap@xxxxxxxxx, prism54-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040603034458.GD7548@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
To all,
I'm sorry to break into this thread, but I was just curious as to what will
eventually happen to wpa_supplicant. Based upon Mr. Malinen's words, as well as
what
a few others in this thread have been saying, will WPA and 802.1x eventually
become
generalized driver frameworks in the kernel (like MII), using the current
Crypto API
and crypto drivers?
I'm just asking from an enduser perspective here, because eventually I will be
purchasing an 802.11g Prism54 device and would like to have an idea of the
relative
ease of configuring 802.1x and WPA in the future.
Thanks,
Brad
=====
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/
|
| Previous by Date: | [4/9][PATCH 2.6] Nuke default_port, references to if_port, medialock, Roger Luethi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [0/9][2.6] via-rhine patches, Roger Luethi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Prism54 WPA Support - wpa_supplicant - Linux general wpa support, Jouni Malinen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Prism54 WPA Support - wpa_supplicant - Linux general wpa support, Jean Tourrilhes |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |