| To: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: net/ipv4/route.c GC patch: is this insane? |
| From: | Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 1 Jun 2004 00:08:01 +1000 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <16571.10357.391130.128260@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040530151434.GE24955@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <16571.9006.703294.10134@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040531122608.GR24955@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <16571.10357.391130.128260@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 02:43:33PM +0200, Robert Olsson wrote: > Daniel Stone writes: > > gc_min_interval was zero - should this increase, or what?. > > If I remember correctly this was an artifact when used by /proc. Try to > set this value via source and avoid /proc for this. In 2.6 it's something > like: > > int ip_rt_gc_min_interval = HZ / 2; This appears to already be the case, in 2.4.23's net/ipv4/route.c, at any rate. -- Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> "The programs are documented fully by _The Rise and Fall of a Fooish Bar_, available by the Info system." -- debian/manpage.sgml.ex, dh_make template
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: net/ipv4/route.c GC patch: is this insane?b4Db3tL, Robert Olsson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: net/ipv4/route.c GC patch: is this insane?, Robert Olsson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: net/ipv4/route.c GC patch: is this insane?b4Db3tL, Robert Olsson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: net/ipv4/route.c GC patch: is this insane?, Robert Olsson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |